As Srinagar’s traffic problems and congestion worsen with each passing day and more and more vehicles hit the road a critical question emerges: should taxpayers alone bear the cost of building and maintaining roads or should industries that profit from vehicle growth like banks and car manufacturers help fund the city’s essential mobility infrastructure, including roads and transportation besides probing innovative policies to fund the urban mobility?

Urban Mobility Problems and Fiscal Burden

Every morning in Srinagar thousands of commuters get stuck in moving traffic. Major intersections get clogged due to the rising number of vehicles. Parking spaces spill onto the roadsides. Travel times keep increasing and the road infrastructure struggles to keep up with the growing demand. What was once a seasonal problem has become a perpetual challenge. While traffic congestion is often seen as a planning issue it is also a financing problem. Roads, flyovers, parking facilities, traffic management systems, pedestrian infrastructure and public transport improvements require investments. Traditionally these costs have been borne by governments and taxpayers. A fundamental question remains largely unanswered: should taxpayers alone finance the infrastructure required by the ever-growing number of vehicles on the road? As Srinagar deals with motorization it may be time to rethink who should bear the responsibility. Should banks that finance vehicle purchases and car manufacturers that profit from vehicle sales contribute directly to building and maintaining roads in addition to the taxes they already pay? Also should government use innovative measures to raise funds and use regressive measure to limit vehicle growth.

Challenges of Growing Traffic

The transformation of Srinagar over the two decades has been dramatic. Rising household incomes expanding areas changing lifestyles and easier access to vehicle financing have led to a huge growth in private vehicle ownership. For families owning a car is no longer a luxury but a necessity. Public transport remains limited in coverage and convenience. Dispersed urban development has increased dependence on vehicles. Banks and non-banking financial companies have actively supported this transition through loan products. The result has been an increase in the number of vehicles on Srinagar’s roads every year. Unfortunately, road infrastructure has not expanded at the pace. Srinagar’s physical geography, existing built environment, heritage areas and limited availability of land constrain large-scale road widening. Consequently, traffic volumes continue to grow while road capacity remains relatively fixed. The consequences are visible everywhere: longer commuting times increased fuel consumption, higher transport costs reduced economic productivity, increased air pollution, greater accident risks and loss of spaces to parking. These costs are borne by society as a whole while the benefits of vehicle sales and vehicle financing accrue, to car manufacturers and lending institutions. This imbalance deserves scrutiny. The Economics Implication of Congestion
Economists say traffic congestion is an example of an externality. When someone buys and uses a vehicle they get benefits like convenience, flexibility and mobility. Each additional vehicle also costs others by contributing to congestion, pollution, road wear and infrastructure demand. These costs to society are rarely included in the price of a vehicle. As a result, cities often have a growing gap between the money they get from vehicle ownership and the money they need to support it. Governments try to fix this gap with registration fees, road taxes, fuel taxes, tolls and parking charges. However, these are often not enough to meet the infrastructure needs of cities that are growing fast. This becomes a problem in cities like Srinagar, where it is hard to expand infrastructure because of geographical, environmental and financial limits.

Impact of Commercial and Financial Institutions

The car market would be very different without car loans. A lot of people buy cars with the help of banks and lending institutions. Easy credit has made it possible for people to buy cars away. Financial institutions make money from car loans, fees, insurance commissions and long-term customer relationships. Every car loan gives lenders a stream of money. The public sector has to deal with the consequences of more people owning cars. This raises a question: should financial institutions help fix the infrastructure problems that come with more cars on the road? If they add a fee to car loans it could create a fund for urban mobility. This fee does not have to be big. Even a small percentage of each car loan could add up to a lot of money when you think about all the loans. This money could be used for things like road improvement projects, smart traffic systems, parking facilities, public transport, pedestrian paths, bike lanes and road safety. The idea is simple: people who benefit from car ownership should help pay for the infrastructure that supports it. The Economics Implication of Congestion is a problem that cities, like Srinagar face every day.

Responsibility of Automotive Manufacturers

The issue becomes really clear when we think about the people who make cars. These companies make money from every car they sell. They want to sell cars so they can grow and make more money. They run ads to get people to buy more powerful cars. They also give people deals to buy cars. The companies compete with each other to sell cars. When it comes to the problems that come with more cars on the road like traffic and parking it is up to the public to deal with them. This means that the companies get to keep the money they make while the public has to pay for the problems. We have to pay for roads parking lots, traffic lights, bridges and intersections with our tax money. Meanwhile the car companies just keep making money from selling cars. It would be better if the car companies helped pay for some of the costs of having cars on the road. They could do this by paying a fee for every car they sell or by helping to pay for roads and other things that make it easier to get. They could also invest in things like traffic lights and parking lots. This way the companies would be helping to pay for the problems they are helping to create.

Best Practices and Experiences

Cities around the world are trying ways to pay for ways to get around. Some cities make the people who build buildings pay for the roads and other things they need. Some cities charge people who drive cars in areas so they can pay for the problems they cause. Other cities use taxes to pay for buses and roads. The idea is simple: the people who use something should help pay for it. The city of Srinagar is unique. This idea still applies. As more people buy cars we need to find ways to pay for the problems that come with them.

Beyond Road Expansion

Just building roads is not the answer. We have seen in cities around the world that when we build roads more people drive and the roads get crowded again. So when car companies and banks help pay for infrastructure it should not just be for building roads. We need a plan that includes public transportation, special lanes for buses streets that are safe for people to walk on, bike lanes and smart traffic lights. The goal should be to make it easy for people to get around not to make it easy for cars to move. If we just focus on making it easy, for cars we will just have traffic in the future. Responsibility of Car Manufacturers. The argument gets even stronger when we think about car manufacturers. Car makers make money directly from vehicles.

Why Existing Resources May Not Be Enough

Some people may say that car companies and banks already pay taxes so they should not have to pay more. This is a point but it does not fully solve the problem. The taxes that companies pay, like taxes, sales taxes and registration fees go into the governments general fund. This money is then used for different things like healthcare, education and security. Very little of it goes directly to fixing urban transport systems that are under a lot of pressure. Dedicated mobility contributions are different because they are directly linked to the problems caused by cars on the road. like environmental rules make polluters pay for the damage they cause mobility policies can make car companies pay for the infrastructure they need. The goal is not to tax the people twice. It is to make sure that the money for infrastructure reflects the reality of cities today.

Need for New Ideas

The debate is not about roads and traffic. It is about the relationship between profit and public responsibility. Cities work because of shared investments. Roads, utilities, public transport, parks and other civic infrastructure help businesses grow. When some industries benefit a lot from these systems it is fair to find ways for them to contribute to their maintenance and growth. Banks benefit from car financing. Car makers benefit from selling cars. People benefit from being able to move. Governments benefit from growth. A sustainable urban future requires everyone to contribute. This is especially important for Srinagar, where the environment's sensitive land is limited and the city is growing fast.

Way Forward for Srinagar

Srinagar is at a point in its growth. The city can keep using funding methods that struggle to keep up with demand or it can try new approaches that share responsibility more fairly among all those who benefit from urban mobility. A dedicated Urban Mobility Infrastructure Fund could provide a source of revenue for transportation improvements. Such a fund could finance projects that improve mobility reduce congestion enhance road safety and strengthen sustainability. Importantly it would recognize that transportation infrastructure is not just the governments responsibility when private companies benefit a lot from its use and growth. The roads of Srinagar are carrying more than vehicles. They are carrying the hopes of a growing city the pressures of urbanization and the expectations of generations. Meeting these challenges will require more than just engineering solutions. It will require innovation, cooperation and a willingness to rethink old assumptions about who should pay for urban mobility. Perhaps the time has come to ask not how we build better roads but also how we build a fairer system, for financing them. For Srinagar the answer may lie in recognizing that the costs of mobility should be shared by all who benefit from it. Not just car buyers. Also car makers, banks and others.

Responsibility of Automotive Manufacturers

The argument becomes even stronger when considering automobile sharing the cost of mobility. If Srinagar wants to fix its traffic and not enough roads it can't just build more roads. The financial burden can't just be on taxpayers. The city needs a plan to maintain roads and make urban travel smoother. This plan should involve all those who benefit from owning and using vehicles. A good starting point is to see that owning a vehicle has both benefits and public costs. Automobile manufacturers make money from selling vehicles. Banks and financial institutions make money from financing vehicles. Vehicle owners get the convenience of travel. The costs of expanding and maintaining roads building flyovers, managing traffic providing parking and reducing congestion are mostly paid by the public. A fairer approach would be to make automobile manufacturers and vehicle-financing institutions contribute to an Urban Mobility and Road Infrastructure Fund. A small fee on every vehicle sold or financed could create a fund for road improvements smart traffic systems, parking facilities, pedestrian infrastructure, cycling networks, road safety projects and public transport. This way those who benefit from vehicle ownership also help manage its effects.
It's also important to address the issue of using roads as private parking spaces. In Srinagar many roads are occupied by parked vehicles reducing road capacity. Vehicle owners often buy cars without ensuring they have parking space, effectively turning roads into free parking areas. The principle should be simple: owning a vehicle means taking responsibility for parking it. Just as homeowners are expected to provide space for their belongings vehicle owners should. Arrange parking space for their vehicles. Public roads are for movement, not long-term vehicle storage. Srinagar should consider linking vehicle registration and parking permits to proof of parking availability in densely built areas. New developments must provide off-street parking. In case vehicular owners are found old as well new are found with out having car parking shall require to renew the registration on yearly basis with repeat registration fee linking registration with car parking to discourage congestion on roads both arterial and within the neighbourhoods. It will reduce demand of on-street parking and discourage occupation of public space besides generating resources for mobility improvements. The revenues from parking fees mobility levies on vehicle financing and infrastructure contributions from automobile manufacturers could support an urban mobility fund. This fund could finance road widening develop -level parking facilities modernize traffic signals improve pedestrian infrastructure strengthen public transport systems and create safer streets. This approach would encourage responsible urban behaviour. Prospective vehicle owners would consider parking availability before buying a vehicle. Financial institutions would become stakeholders in mobility. Automobile manufacturers would contribute to the infrastructure that supports their business. Importantly taxpayers would no longer bear the entire burden of accommodating increasing vehicle numbers. For Srinagar efficient management of existing road space is crucial. Reclaiming roads from parking can often achieve benefits comparable to road widening but at a fraction of the cost.
The future of mobility in Srinagar depends on financial innovation and institutional accountability. A city that expects taxpayers alone to fund the infrastructure demands of motorization will struggle. A city that ensures all beneficiaries of mobility contribute their fair share stands a chance of creating efficient sustainable roads. The real challenge is not simply how to build roads but how to build a fair and sustainable system, for financing and managing them. By combining infrastructure contributions from automobile manufacturers and financial institutions with parking accountability Srinagar can move towards a more balanced and resilient urban mobility system. This system would share the costs of mobility among those who benefit from it and preserve the city’s roads for their purpose: moving people and goods efficiently and safely.

Email:---------------------------hamwani24@gmail.com