BREAKING NEWS
Jauhar University's alleged crime—land and building permissions—pales against these systemic frauds that subvert educational standards for profit. The fight in Rampur is to save an institution built for the poor; the scandals elsewhere involve enriching the powerful by compromising students' futures. It is a stark contrast that questions the selective outrage of the system
The stay on Jauhar University's demolition is a reprieve for more than just its 3,000 students; it is a moment that has thrown a harsh spotlight on higher education in India. While the Uttar Pradesh Government's swift decision to halt the bulldozers pragmatically de-escalated tensions, the episode has inadvertently done what years of publicity could not: it has brought the physical and intellectual scale of Azam Khan's vision into the global spotlight, exposing uncomfortable truths about governance and educational priorities.
A Vision Built on a Grand Scale
To understand why this agitation resonates, one must look beyond land disputes and examine what has actually been built. Mohammad Ali Jauhar University is no makeshift college; it is a sprawling testament to ambition. Spread over 250–350 acres, the campus houses faculties of Engineering, Law, Medicine, and Humanities, complete with modern infrastructure, research labs, and extensive sports facilities.
Compare this to the expansion of central higher education. Official data shows the Government of India has established only 8 Central Universities since 2014, including Sindhu Central University in Ladakh and Sammakka Sarakka Central Tribal University in Telangana. While these are crucial national projects, Jauhar University—established through a state act in 2006—is comparable in scale to many of them. It stands as a significant investment in the educational infrastructure of the Rohilkhand region.
The Real Crime
The legal case against the university centers on buildings constructed without approved maps and fire safety violations. But the political narrative has sparked a deeper debate: what constitutes a "crime" against education?
Asaduddin Owaisi, AIMIM chief, framed the demolition within a larger context of educational disparity:
"This is not about Azam Khan alone. It is about safeguarding Muslims' right to higher education. If illegal construction is the issue, then why are countless government buildings, police stations, and offices built on encroached land not being demolished? Why only Jauhar University?"
He noted that while Muslims constitute 19–20% of UP's population, they represent only 3.5–3.7% of graduates. "If you want to dismantle the university, it means you do not want Muslims to be educated," he asserted.
The university's social role reinforces this concern. It offers 50% fee concessions to SC/ST students and orphans—a lifeline for the disadvantaged. While a 2020 district report claimed high fees, the prevailing narrative highlights its role as a beacon for the poor.
In stark contrast, consider the corruption scandals plaguing higher education. In Tamil Nadu, the DVAC booked Anna University officials for granting affiliations to ineligible colleges, revealing that 47% of its affiliated colleges were involved in faculty duplication—professors existing only on paper to save costs and meet criteria. Similarly, the ED recently raided 10 states over a bribery scandal where NMC and Health Ministry officials allegedly shared confidential inspection data, allowing colleges to arrange ghost faculty and fictitious patients.
Jauhar University's alleged crime—land and building permissions—pales against these systemic frauds that subvert educational standards for profit. The fight in Rampur is to save an institution built for the poor; the scandals elsewhere involve enriching the powerful by compromising students' futures. It is a stark contrast that questions the selective outrage of the system.
The Precedent Problem in Uttar Pradesh
The administration's swift compliance with the stay order invites critical examination of "Bulldozer Justice." Why target this university when numerous UP government buildings stand on disputed or encroached lands? From police stations and tehsils built on contested revenue records to politically connected projects like the Lucknow Ram Mandir Trust office (allegedly allotted from school land), selective application breeds perceptions of vindictiveness—which the government's decision to halt demolition tacitly acknowledges.
A Historic Echo
The Jauhar protests came on the heels of nationwide NEET paper leak demonstrations that forced a Union Education Minister's resignation, galvanizing student activism. RJD Spokesperson Kanchana Yadav declared:
"If we can force a Union Minister to resign, we can stop bulldozers from destroying our university. This is about dignity, education, and our future."
Maulana Mohibullah Nadvi, SP MP, who was stopped by police from entering the campus, added:
"This demolition order is an attack on the future of Rampur's youth. Education cannot be bulldozed."
The AIMPLB called the order "vindictive and unjust," while Jamaat-e-Islami Hind submitted a memorandum to the Governor urging intervention.
What Makes Jauhar University Stand Out?
While it lacks the historical legacy of Kashi Vidyapith or the central funding of Central University of UP, its infrastructure rivals any state university. More importantly, its social justice model—50% fee concessions for SC/ST students and orphans—places it ahead of institutions that charge exorbitant fees without supporting the underprivileged. In an increasingly commercialized higher education landscape, Jauhar University remains a rare institution prioritizing the economically weakest.
Legal Safeguards
Citing Section 27(1) of the UP Urban Planning and Development Act, 1973, Jamiat President Maulana Mahmood Madani stressed that demolition is neither the sole nor mandatory remedy—alternatives like regularisation, compounding, revised plans, or penalties must be explored first. Courts have favoured these corrective measures over demolition in cases involving Kanpur's Rooma Industrial Area college and Varanasi, Jhansi, and Allahabad Development Authorities. For an educational institution, "justice, rule of law, and public interest require all statutory alternatives be examined before demolition."
Madani urged the government to reconsider the order and impose fines if needed, rather than destroy a university named after freedom fighter Maulana Mohammad Ali Jauhar—who also founded Jamia Millia Islamia. He warned that demolition would violate students' fundamental rights and undermine natural justice, urging the government to await judicial process before any irreversible action.
The Way Forward
The stay is relief, but merely a band-aid. The "worldwide publicity" generated by this episode highlights the institution's stature but also exposes the administration to accusations of targeting a minority educational hub. The correct step would be to cancel the demolition directive permanently.
If land violations exist, the state should follow civil process—levying fines or seeking compensation—rather than destroying infrastructure serving thousands of underprivileged students. In a country grappling with education corruption, where affiliation can be bought and faculty faked, demolishing a university that actually educates the poor would be a devastating blow to educational equity itself.
The court has offered a window for dignified resolution. Utilizing it to save the university, rather than reopening old wounds, would be the hallmark of mature governance. As Rampur's students have shown, the youth of this country are watching—and they are no longer willing to stay silent.
Email:------------------------------editoronkar@gmail.com
Jauhar University's alleged crime—land and building permissions—pales against these systemic frauds that subvert educational standards for profit. The fight in Rampur is to save an institution built for the poor; the scandals elsewhere involve enriching the powerful by compromising students' futures. It is a stark contrast that questions the selective outrage of the system
The stay on Jauhar University's demolition is a reprieve for more than just its 3,000 students; it is a moment that has thrown a harsh spotlight on higher education in India. While the Uttar Pradesh Government's swift decision to halt the bulldozers pragmatically de-escalated tensions, the episode has inadvertently done what years of publicity could not: it has brought the physical and intellectual scale of Azam Khan's vision into the global spotlight, exposing uncomfortable truths about governance and educational priorities.
A Vision Built on a Grand Scale
To understand why this agitation resonates, one must look beyond land disputes and examine what has actually been built. Mohammad Ali Jauhar University is no makeshift college; it is a sprawling testament to ambition. Spread over 250–350 acres, the campus houses faculties of Engineering, Law, Medicine, and Humanities, complete with modern infrastructure, research labs, and extensive sports facilities.
Compare this to the expansion of central higher education. Official data shows the Government of India has established only 8 Central Universities since 2014, including Sindhu Central University in Ladakh and Sammakka Sarakka Central Tribal University in Telangana. While these are crucial national projects, Jauhar University—established through a state act in 2006—is comparable in scale to many of them. It stands as a significant investment in the educational infrastructure of the Rohilkhand region.
The Real Crime
The legal case against the university centers on buildings constructed without approved maps and fire safety violations. But the political narrative has sparked a deeper debate: what constitutes a "crime" against education?
Asaduddin Owaisi, AIMIM chief, framed the demolition within a larger context of educational disparity:
"This is not about Azam Khan alone. It is about safeguarding Muslims' right to higher education. If illegal construction is the issue, then why are countless government buildings, police stations, and offices built on encroached land not being demolished? Why only Jauhar University?"
He noted that while Muslims constitute 19–20% of UP's population, they represent only 3.5–3.7% of graduates. "If you want to dismantle the university, it means you do not want Muslims to be educated," he asserted.
The university's social role reinforces this concern. It offers 50% fee concessions to SC/ST students and orphans—a lifeline for the disadvantaged. While a 2020 district report claimed high fees, the prevailing narrative highlights its role as a beacon for the poor.
In stark contrast, consider the corruption scandals plaguing higher education. In Tamil Nadu, the DVAC booked Anna University officials for granting affiliations to ineligible colleges, revealing that 47% of its affiliated colleges were involved in faculty duplication—professors existing only on paper to save costs and meet criteria. Similarly, the ED recently raided 10 states over a bribery scandal where NMC and Health Ministry officials allegedly shared confidential inspection data, allowing colleges to arrange ghost faculty and fictitious patients.
Jauhar University's alleged crime—land and building permissions—pales against these systemic frauds that subvert educational standards for profit. The fight in Rampur is to save an institution built for the poor; the scandals elsewhere involve enriching the powerful by compromising students' futures. It is a stark contrast that questions the selective outrage of the system.
The Precedent Problem in Uttar Pradesh
The administration's swift compliance with the stay order invites critical examination of "Bulldozer Justice." Why target this university when numerous UP government buildings stand on disputed or encroached lands? From police stations and tehsils built on contested revenue records to politically connected projects like the Lucknow Ram Mandir Trust office (allegedly allotted from school land), selective application breeds perceptions of vindictiveness—which the government's decision to halt demolition tacitly acknowledges.
A Historic Echo
The Jauhar protests came on the heels of nationwide NEET paper leak demonstrations that forced a Union Education Minister's resignation, galvanizing student activism. RJD Spokesperson Kanchana Yadav declared:
"If we can force a Union Minister to resign, we can stop bulldozers from destroying our university. This is about dignity, education, and our future."
Maulana Mohibullah Nadvi, SP MP, who was stopped by police from entering the campus, added:
"This demolition order is an attack on the future of Rampur's youth. Education cannot be bulldozed."
The AIMPLB called the order "vindictive and unjust," while Jamaat-e-Islami Hind submitted a memorandum to the Governor urging intervention.
What Makes Jauhar University Stand Out?
While it lacks the historical legacy of Kashi Vidyapith or the central funding of Central University of UP, its infrastructure rivals any state university. More importantly, its social justice model—50% fee concessions for SC/ST students and orphans—places it ahead of institutions that charge exorbitant fees without supporting the underprivileged. In an increasingly commercialized higher education landscape, Jauhar University remains a rare institution prioritizing the economically weakest.
Legal Safeguards
Citing Section 27(1) of the UP Urban Planning and Development Act, 1973, Jamiat President Maulana Mahmood Madani stressed that demolition is neither the sole nor mandatory remedy—alternatives like regularisation, compounding, revised plans, or penalties must be explored first. Courts have favoured these corrective measures over demolition in cases involving Kanpur's Rooma Industrial Area college and Varanasi, Jhansi, and Allahabad Development Authorities. For an educational institution, "justice, rule of law, and public interest require all statutory alternatives be examined before demolition."
Madani urged the government to reconsider the order and impose fines if needed, rather than destroy a university named after freedom fighter Maulana Mohammad Ali Jauhar—who also founded Jamia Millia Islamia. He warned that demolition would violate students' fundamental rights and undermine natural justice, urging the government to await judicial process before any irreversible action.
The Way Forward
The stay is relief, but merely a band-aid. The "worldwide publicity" generated by this episode highlights the institution's stature but also exposes the administration to accusations of targeting a minority educational hub. The correct step would be to cancel the demolition directive permanently.
If land violations exist, the state should follow civil process—levying fines or seeking compensation—rather than destroying infrastructure serving thousands of underprivileged students. In a country grappling with education corruption, where affiliation can be bought and faculty faked, demolishing a university that actually educates the poor would be a devastating blow to educational equity itself.
The court has offered a window for dignified resolution. Utilizing it to save the university, rather than reopening old wounds, would be the hallmark of mature governance. As Rampur's students have shown, the youth of this country are watching—and they are no longer willing to stay silent.
Email:------------------------------editoronkar@gmail.com
© Copyright 2023 brighterkashmir.com All Rights Reserved. Quantum Technologies