The events of 26th and 27th February 2019 constitute a landmark in the history of India’s national security, as they reflect the country’s growing confidence, capability, and responsibility in dealing with cross-border terrorism. These developments were a direct result of the Pulwama terror attack of 14 February 2019, and they showed how India used its sovereign right to self-defence in a calibrated and restrained manner, without violating international norms or destabilising regional peace.
The series started with the Pulwama attack, where a suicide bomber attacked a CRPF convoy in Jammu and Kashmir, killing 40 Indian security personnel. The attack was a great shock to the country and highlighted the constant danger of terrorism to the internal security of India. Pulwama was not just a sad event, it became a defining moment that demanded reassuranceto the people that the nation would take care of its troops and national pride. The national mood was one of unity, determination, and trust in democraticinstitutions.
In the immediate aftermath, India actually took a balanced approach: diplomatic efforts were stepped up to stress the global dimensions of the threat posed by terrorism and to rally global opinion against the extremist networks. Yet, Indian leadership also came to realize that to re-establish deterrence, there needed to be action to complement diplomacy. Any action, however, would need to be taken in a firm but responsible manner, driven by the imperatives of our national interest, regional stability, and security.
This evaluation ultimately led to airstrikes in Balakot on February 26, 2019, carried out by the IAF, which exercised India's right to defend itself against terrorism. An aircraft of the Indian Air Force targeted a terror training camp that was affiliated with the terror group Jaish-e-Mohammed, without targeting any civilian groups. This strike was a counter-terror attack that demonstrated responsibility and precision.
The Balakot operation played a major role in India’s security posture. It proved the efficiency of the Indian military readiness, intelligence and political decision-making. More to the point, it sent a powerful but responsible message: India would not accept any attacks on its security forces, yet it would act responsibly within the restraints and respect for international law. This increased India’s credibility as a country that could protect itself without destabilising the region both locally and internationally.
The developments of 27 February 2019 further tested India’s management capabilities. After aerial battles between the two air forces, an Indian pilot was taken captive after his plane crashed. During this tense period, India remained calm and did not take any unnecessary steps that would worsen the situation. Diplomatic activity was maintained in parallel with military preparedness, this was in keeping with the Indian philosophy that power is not just in action but also in restraint.
The safe return of the Indian pilot was welcomed both nationally and globally. This episode strengthened the power of peaceful diplomacy supported by plausible defence readiness. It emphasized the role of India as a responsible regional power that values human life and stability even in times of extreme tension.
In broader strategic terms, the 26 and 27 February events showed that India could act responsibly in a nuclearised environment. India demonstrated that deterrence and restraint do not contradict each other but complement one another. Through accuracy and restraint, India strengthened its long-standing policy of credible deterrence and a pledge of peace.
These advancements also had a lastingimpact on India’s internal security system. After 2019, intelligence coordination, technological modernization, air defence preparedness, and inter-agency cooperation were more emphasized. The experience enhanced civil-military coordination and the significance of integrated national security planning. It also boosted the confidence of people in India’sdefence institutions andleadership.
Over time, 26 February has come to symbolise India’s resolve, while 27 February represents its strategic maturity in crisis management. Collectively, these dates indicate the development of India as a self-assured power that neither seeks confrontation norhesitates to protect its citizens.
Importantly, India’s actions were largely perceived by the international community as self-defence. Most international allies acknowledged the valid security interests of India and its non-aggressive behaviour. This strengthened the perception of India as a country that believes in democratic principles, international law, and regional stability and strongly protects its sovereignty.
The events of 26th and 27th February 2019 represent a decisive chapterin India’s national security. They show how India was able to mix bravery with prudence, power with duty, and action with diplomacy. These events remain a strong illustration of how a responsible nation can defend its people and, at the same time, promote peace and stability in the region as India continues to ascend to the international scene.

Email:------------------aidahsyed3@gmail.com